Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK SA No.328 of 1996 Iswar Bhakta and others ..... Appellants Represented by Adv. – Mr. K.J. Prakash, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. S.K.Padhi, Sr. Advocate -versus- Digamabar Singh and others ..... Respondents Represented by Adv. - M/s Manoj Mishra, P.k.das, J.panda CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA ORDER 05.01.2026 Order No. 20. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents are present. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that, he has no instruction from the side of the appellants to prosecute the appeal, for which, the above conduct of the appellants itself shows that, they are not interested to pursue the appeal further. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for the default of the appellants. 4. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed and disposed of finally for non-prosecution from the side of the appellants. ( ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) Judge Jagabandhu Designation: Personal Assistant