IN TH 225 Gurmej Si Rupesh Ku CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU impugned learned Ad petition fil Act, 1996 a P-3) filed b Award date motion has many as se which on 24.2.2023 t two dates i request of Civil Revision No.2940 of 2016 (O & IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Revision N Date of decision mej Singh Channi Versus Kumar Nagpal and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the petitioner. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present civil revi gned order dated 04.4.2015 (Anne ed Additional District Judge, Chandig ion filed under Section 34 of the A 1996 against the Arbitration Award d filed by the respondents No.1 and 2, rd dated 04.10.2012 has been set aside The matter pertains to the y on has not been issued till date. The as seven times the matter has been h on 04 dates i.e. 10.3.2017, 20 .2023 there was no representation on b dates i.e. 26.10.2026 and 04.9.2019 the est of learned counsel for the petition O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ion No.2940 of 2016 (O & M) cision :-10.03.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA il revision is for setting aside the (Annexure P-1) passed by the handigarh, whereby the objection the Arbitration and Conciliation ard dated 04.10.2012 (Annexure 2, has been accepted and the t aside. the year 2016 and notice of . The order sheets show that as been listed for hearing, out of 17, 20.3.2018, 14.5.2019 and n on behalf of petitioner and on 019 the matter was adjourned on etitioner. On 29.1.2019, record VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 10.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document was requis Judge, Cha of petitione petitioner present litig of the Cou petitioner has adopte neither the pursuing th option exce March 10 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo Civil Revision No.2940 of 2016 (O & requisitioned from the Court of lea e, Chandigarh. Even today there is no titioner. A bare reading of the abo ioner has exhibited an utterly casual a nt litigation. It is to be appreciated tha e Court has been expended in affo ioner in the interest of justice. On the dopted an utterly casual and careless er the petitioner nor his counsel a ing the present matter. Thus, this C n except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, 10, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No O & M) 2 of learned Additional District re is no representation on behalf e above facts shows that the sual attitude in the pursuit of the ted that very valuable public time n affording opportunities to the On the other hand, the petitioner areless approach. It is clear that nsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other r non-prosecution. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 10.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document