IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 201 RSA-394-1996 XOBJS-17-C-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.01.2026 Bank of Maharashtra …..Appellant Vs. F.C.I. and Another .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Munish Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Pranav Chadha, Advocate for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant has made a statement so as to withdraw the appeal under the instruc"ons of the appellant. It is also informed that cross-objec"ons had been filed by respondent No.2, who is not pursuing the same. In view of the above, the appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn; whereas cross-objec"ons are dismissed in default for want of prosecu"on. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE January 16, 2026 Nee"ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.01.16 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document