Sri Vasuda Restaurant and Bar, v. Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS
CC/1996/2026 · 2026-06-14
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body1996
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1996 DAILYLAW 1 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1996 DAILYLAW 1 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010252862026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1996/2026 Between:
1. SRI VASUDA RESTAURANT AND BAR,, REP. BY ITS LICENSE, SANABOINA SURESH, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. DAMAYAPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY TOWN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. ISWARYA BAR AND RESTAURANT,, REP. BYU ITS JAKKAMPUDI SRINIVAS GOPAL, S/O. J. LAKSHMIPATHI RAO, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. BALAJIPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. CITY SPIRIT BAR AND RESTAURANT,, REP. BY ITS AKULA SYAM BABU, S/O. BASKAR RAO, OCC. BUSINESS, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. A.V. APPARAO ROAD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SRI SATYA SRINIVASA BAR AND RESTAURANT,, REP. BY ITS LICENSEE, PAMPANA SATYANARAYANA S/O. BHASKAR RAO, OCC. BUSINESS, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O. NEAR RAILWAY STATION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. VENKATA DURGA RESTAURANT AND BAR, REP. BY ITS LICENSEE, RATNAM SRI KRISHNA, S/O. VEERABBAI, AGED 44 YEARS,
OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KONTHAMURU, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. CLASSMATE RESTAURANT AND BAR,, REP. BY ITS LICENSEE, DEVARAPALLI KRISHNA, S/O. VEERA VENKATA RAO, AGED 74 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. J.N.ROAD,
2
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. NAVEENA RESTAURANT AND BAR,, REP. BY ITS LICENSEE, SANABOINA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED 68 YEARS,
OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KORUKONDA ROAD RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. SRI RUDRA BAR AND RESTAURANT,, REP. BY ITS LICENSE, SANGISETTI RAVI CHANDRA S/O. VENKATESWARARAO, AGED 42 YEARS,
OCC.BUSINESS, R/O. KADIYAPULANKA, RAJAHMUNDRYRURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. ESWAR SAVERA BAR AND RESTAURANT,, REP. BY ITS LICENSEE, N. NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. RAMA RAO, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. A.V. ROAD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. MENAKA REDDY BAR AND RESTAURANT,, REP. BY ITS LICENSEE, MALLIDI SATYA NARENDRA REDDY, S/O. RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.
STADIUM ROAD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 11. RELAX RESTAURANT AND BAR,, REP. BY ITS LICENSEE, M.V.K.RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY, S/O. M. APPALA RAJU, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. STADIUM BACKSIDE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 12. HIMALAYA RESTAURANT AND BAR,, REP. BY ITS LICENSEE, R.
VENKATA SWAMY, S/O. R. SANKU AGED 51 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. T. NAGAR, OPP. SBI BANK, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.
CHAMAKURI SRIDHAR IAS, THE COMMISSIONER
AND DIRECTOR, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, EXCISE COMPLEX, R.S.NO.88-2B, SAI VIHAR APARTMENTS, POULTRY FARM ROAD,
3
PRASADAMPADU (V), VIJAYAWADA-521108. 3. Y SRILATHA, THE DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER/, LICENSING AUTHORITY, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents 1 to 3 herein for their wilful violation and deliberate disobedience to the orders dated 19.01.2026 passed by this Hon'ble Court in I.A.No.1 of 2026 in WP.No.1246 of 2026 by His Lordships Hon'ble Sri Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. The Court made the following:
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1996 of 2026
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. The said fact was not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.06.2026 SJ
5
83 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Contempt Case No.1996 of 2026
15.06.2026 SSJJ