212. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Gurminder Singh Bedi State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J 1. 05.05.1995 (Annexure P whereby his representation against the termination order has been rejected, and also direct the respondent to reinstate him and benefits. 2. petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the present writ petition any further and, according 3. 15.07.2026 sanjeev IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision: 15.07.2026 Gurminder Singh Bedi Versus State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Paras Chander Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG Punjab ----- DEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is seeking to set aside his termination order dated 05.05.1995 (Annexure P-2) and the order dated 19.08.2020 (Annexure P whereby his representation against the termination order has been rejected, irect the respondent to reinstate him and At the outset, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the present writ petition any further and, accordingly, he Dismissed as not pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL  Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19909-2020 Date of decision: 15.07.2026 …. Petitioner …. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Paras Chander Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG Punjab. is seeking to set aside his termination order dated 2) and the order dated 19.08.2020 (Annexure P-6) whereby his representation against the termination order has been rejected, irect the respondent to reinstate him and grant consequential ounsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the present he does not press the same. SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No is seeking to set aside his termination order dated 6) whereby his representation against the termination order has been rejected, consequential ounsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the present SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.16 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document