IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 RSA-2239-1995 Date of decision :13.07.2026 SUCHA SINGH AND OTHERS ... APPELLANTS VERSUS BIMLA DEVI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Sahil Loura, Advocate for Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Gurdial Singh Jaswal, Advocate for the respondents. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellants on the last date of hearing submitted that he is not in touch with the appellants and has no instructions. For this reason, notices were ordered to be issued to the appellants vide order dated 22.04.2026. Appellant Nos. 11 and 16 were duly served; however, none has appeared on their behalf. The remaining appellants, namely Appellant Nos. 1, 3, 8, 12, 14, 17, 18 and 19, have expired, while the other appellants could not be served for want of correct and complete addresses. 2. In these circumstances, as none of the appellants has come forward to prosecute the appeal, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the appellants to seek revival of the appeal by showing sufficient cause. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly. 13.07.2026 (PARMOD GOYAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.13 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document