IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 119 Mukhtar Rana State of Punjab & others CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the 19.08.201 Class-III (School Cadre) Services (First Amendment) Rules, 1995 dated 08.07.1995 2. inclined to entertain the present petition promotion of private respondent challenged by filing the present petition in 2026, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. 3. 26.05.2026 Vimal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Mukhtar Rana Versus State of Punjab & others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Aashish Sood, Advocate, for Mr. Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate, for the petitioner. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the 16 (Annexure P-1) made in violation of III (School Cadre) Services (First Amendment) Rules, 1995 dated 08.07.1995. After arguing for some time inclined to entertain the present petition motion of private respondents made in the year 2016 ha challenged by filing the present petition in 2026, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. 26.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16811-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 …Petitioner ...Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Aashish Sood, Advocate, for Mr. Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate, for the petitioner. petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the promotion order dated 1) made in violation of Punjab State Education III (School Cadre) Services (First Amendment) Rules, 1995 dated and realizing that this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition finding considerable delay, as the s made in the year 2016 has been challenged by filing the present petition in 2026, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Yes/No petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of dated Punjab State Education III (School Cadre) Services (First Amendment) Rules, 1995 dated and realizing that this Court is not considerable delay, as the been challenged by filing the present petition in 2026, learned counsel for the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.26 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.