101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-367-1995 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.02.2026 SATISH CHAND AND ORS .... Appellants VERSUS PIARA SINGH AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Kanish Jindal, Advocate for the appellants. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1. On 30.09.2025 the following order was passed : ‘As per the office report, neither the application has been filed to implead LRs of respondents No.1, 4(i) nor the correct addresses of respondents No.2, 3, 4(ii), 4(iii) and 4(iv) have been filed. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he is not in touch with the appellants. Let notice be issued to the appellants for 10.11.2025.’ 2. As per the Office report, the appellants remain unserved as their attorney holder, namely, Naurata Singh, has since died. There is no other address of the appellants available with the Court for effecting their service except the one mentioned in the memo of parties and in the judgments and decrees passed by both the Courts concerned. AMAN JAIN 2026.02.03 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment RSA-367-1995 (O&M) -2- 3. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present regular second appeal for non-prosecution. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 02.02.2026 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2026.02.03 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment