Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1994 DAILYLAW 51 (PNJ)

SURINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CWP/26030/2026 · 2026-08-18

Pankaj Jain

body1994

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[143] Surinder Si State of Ha Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] the nature o the petitio Municipal C [2] advance no petitioners. (Annexure Municipal claim of th representati [3] Nos.2 & 3, IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA CWP-2603 Date of De der Singh and others versus of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Gagandeep Singh Sirphikh Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Senior D Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advoca **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) By way of the present writ peti ature of Mandamus, directing the resp petitioners under Second Proviso icipal Corporation Act, 1994. Mr. Parmar, counsel for resp nce notice and submits that no clai ioners. The application appended exure P-1) was filed before the Ch icipal Authorities. However, Mr. Pa f the petitioners will be considered sentation. The statement made by Mr. 2 & 3, satisfies counsel for the petition T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 26030-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 18.08.2026 …Petitioners ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN irphikhi, Advocate for the petitioners. nior DAG, Haryana. dvocate for respondent Nos.2 & 3. rit petition, the petitioners seek a writ he respondents to consider the claim o o to Section 164(c) of Haryan r respondent Nos.2 & 3, appears o claim has been filed as yet by th ended along with the writ petitio he Chief Minister and not before th r. Parmar, assures the Court that th sidered by treating the writ petition a Mr. Parmar, counsel for responde etitioners. ners. a writ in claim of Haryana ears on by the petition fore the that the tition as pondent RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.08.19 15:50 I agree to specified portions of this document CWP-26030-2026 (O&M) -2- [4] In view thereof, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioners by treating the present writ petiton as representation, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 12 weeks, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. [5] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 18.08.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.08.19 15:50 I agree to specified portions of this document