Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-22233
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
113
Ompati
State of Haryana and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: -
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
1.
Constitution of India directing the petitioner’s husband for grant of First Higher Standard Pay Scale and Second Higher Standard Pay Scale on Completion of 18 years and 20 years of regular satisfactory service in terms of Government Instructions dated 08.02.1994 (Annexure P rendered in HSMITC and also direct the respondents to grant the Second Assured Career Progression (ACP) to the petiti 01.01.1996 Career Progression on completion of 30 years regular satisfactory service and the petitioner be further granted all consequential benefits including the arrears along with interest and enhanced family pension.
2. petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if 233-2026
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP Date of Decision:
.… Petitioner Versus
State of Haryana and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Vijay Deep Rathee, Advocate for
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Article Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of directing the respondent authorities for considering the case of the petitioner’s husband for grant of First Higher Standard Pay Scale and Second Higher Standard Pay Scale on Completion of 18 years and 20 ars of regular satisfactory service in terms of Government Instructions 08.02.1994 (Annexure P-4) after counting the regular service in HSMITC and also direct the respondents to grant the Second Assured Career Progression (ACP) to the petiti 01.01.1996 on completion of 20 years services and the Third Assured Career Progression on completion of 30 years regular satisfactory service and the petitioner be further granted all consequential benefits including the arrears along with interest and enhanced family pension. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22233-2026 Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 Petitioners
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate for the petitioners. filed under Articles 226/227 of the for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus respondent authorities for considering the case of the petitioner’s husband for grant of First Higher Standard Pay Scale and Second Higher Standard Pay Scale on Completion of 18 years and 20 ars of regular satisfactory service in terms of Government Instructions after counting the regular service in HSMITC and also direct the respondents to grant the Second Assured Career Progression (ACP) to the petitioner’s husband w.e.f. 20 years services and the Third Assured Career Progression on completion of 30 years regular satisfactory service and the petitioner be further granted all consequential benefits including the arrears along with interest and enhanced family pension. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is
of the
respondent authorities for considering the case of the petitioner’s husband for grant of First Higher Standard Pay Scale and Second Higher Standard Pay Scale on Completion of 18 years and 20 ars of regular satisfactory service in terms of Government Instructions after counting the regular service in HSMITC and also direct the respondents to grant the Second oner’s husband w.e.f. 20 years services and the Third Assured Career Progression on completion of 30 years regular satisfactory service and the petitioner be further granted all consequential benefits including After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the direction is RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.23 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
CWP-22233
issued to respondent 21.03.2026
3.
4. on behalf of respondent case the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, is accepted.
5.
into the merits of the present petition, the same is direction to consider and decide the (Annexure P with law, within a period of certified copy of this order.
6.
22.07.2026 rishu
233-2026
-2-
issued to respondents to consider and decide 21.03.2026 (Annexure P-15) in a time bound Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., on behalf of respondent-State and submits that case the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, is
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without going into the merits of the present petition, the same is direction to the respondents/Competent Authority, concerned and decide the aforesaid Legal Notice dated 21.03.2026 (Annexure P-15) by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance with law, within a period of 06 months certified copy of this order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
decide the Legal Notice dated in a time bound manner. , Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice State and submits that she has ‘no objection’ in case the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, is After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without going into the merits of the present petition, the same is disposed of with a s/Competent Authority, concerned, to forthwith Legal Notice dated 21.03.2026 by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance from the date of receipt of a Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Yes/No Legal Notice dated accepts notice in case the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, is After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without going with a
Legal Notice dated 21.03.2026 by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance from the date of receipt of a RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.23 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.