Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
211
Smt. Santosh Rani
...... Petitioner
Versus
Financial Commissioner-cum- Secretary to Government of Haryana & ors.
..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
***
Present :- Ms. Sumitra, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana
***
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 2
Ordered accordingly. 3
The question with regard to the validity of Section 175(q) of The Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 is kept open. 4
Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed off.
( PANKAJ JAIN ) 13.07.2026
JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.14 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document