Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE H
Mahinder Singh State of Haryana CORAM : HO
HO
Present : Mr
for
Mr
Mr
for
DEEPAK SIBA
1. At Gram Panchaya to the petitioner 1994 (for short the respondent petitioner unde (Regulation) Ac eviction from th
2. In t respondent No. therein the noti 24(1) of the 199
Sr. No.162
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH
CWP-2343 Date of Deci Singh
Versus aryana and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Pawan Attri, Advocate
for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5-Gram Panchay
*** SIBAL, J. (Oral)
At the outset, learned counsel app chayat submits that the impugned not titioner under Section 24(1) of the H short-1994 Act) be treated as withdra ondent-Gram Panchayat to initiate under Section 7 of the Haryana on) Act, 1961 (for short-1961 Act), see rom the unauthorized possession over In the light of the afore statement t No.5, the present petition which h e notice dated 02.06.2025 issued to t he 1994 Act has been rendered infruc JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 2343-2026
f Decision : 12.02.2026
…Petitioner
…Respondents EPAK SIBAL PITA BANERJI
aryana. anchayat. el appearing for respondent No.5- ed notice dated 02.06.2025 issued the Haryana Panchayati Raj, Act ithdrawn but liberty be granted to nitiate proceedings against the aryana Village Common Lands ct), seeking therein the petitioner’s over the panchayat land. ment made by learned counsel for hich has been filed to challenge ed to the petitioner under Section infructuous and is disposed of as PRINCE SAINI 2026.02.13 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-2343-202
such with libert petitioner under case, any such p same shall be fin Grade within th opportunity of h
12.02.2026 Prince
Whether speakin Whether reporta
2026
liberty to the respondent-Gram Panch under Section 7 of the 1961 Act wit such petition is preferred by the respo l be finally disposed of by the concern thin three months from the date of its f ty of hearing to all affected parties and
(DEEPAK
JU (LAPITA
JU
speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No reportable :
Yes/No -2-
Panchayat to seek eviction of the ct with a further direction that in e respondent-Gram Panchayat, the oncerned Assistant Collector, First of its filing but only after granting ies and in accordance with law.
EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
PITA BANERJI) JUDGE
PRINCE SAINI 2026.02.13 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document