904 SA NO. 161 OF 1993.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 SECOND APPEAL NO. 161 OF 1993 Kashiba Gangaram Dhangar. VERSUS Vijay Madhavrao Naik And Others. ... Mr. A. R. Lukhe h/f Mr. S. K. Shelke., Advocate for Appellant Mr. S. Y. Mahajan, Advocate for Respondents WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 280 OF 2004WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1448 OF 1993 IN SA/161/1993WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1447 OF 1993 IN SA/160/1993WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2004 …. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 10.09.2026 PER COURT :- SECOND APPEAL NO. 161 OF 1993 1. Learned Advocate for the Appellant has not taken necessary steps in the matter, despite several opportunities having been granted. 2. Keep this appeal for dismissal on 24.09.2026 at 10:30 a.m. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1448 OF 1993 IN SA/161/1993 1. This is an application seeking stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and order. 1 of 2 (( 2 )) 904 SA NO. 161 OF 1993 2. The application has been pending for more than 32 years. Despite such a long period, the applicant has not taken necessary steps for its prosecution. In view of the same, the application deserves to be disposed of for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the application is disposed of for non-prosecution. SECOND APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2004 1. Learned Advocate for the Appellant prays that Second Appeal No.281 of 2004 be tagged with the present Appeal. He seeks time. 2. Second Appeal No.281 of 2004 be tagged with the present Second appeals and listed on 24.09.2026 for final hearing. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2