Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1993 DAILYLAW 30 (PNJ)

BIKKAR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

RSA/926/2002 · 2026-08-07

Harkesh Manuja

body1993

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH BIKKAR SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. HARKESH MANUJA By way of present judgment and decrees Courts below whereby, a suit for declaration and filed at the instance of dated 24.08.1993 was dismissed by the recovery to the tune of Rs.1,04,394.28 penalty was ordered Learned counsel submits t despite having made all sincere efforts, no one is coming forward to pursue the present appeal. In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also sta 07.08.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: BIKKAR SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. D.S. Gill, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to judgment and decrees dated 10.10.2001 and 30.04.1999 passed by the Courts below whereby, a suit for declaration and filed at the instance of appellant-plaintiff assailing the validity of order dated 24.08.1993 was dismissed by the to the tune of Rs.1,04,394.28 @Rs.1000 per month towards ordered to be made from the appellant Learned counsel submits that appellant is no more and despite having made all sincere efforts, no one is coming forward to pursue the present appeal. In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also sta (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-926-2002 Date of Decision: AUGUST 07, 2026 ........Appellant ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA D.S. Gill, Advocate for the appellant. appeal, challenge has been laid to dated 10.10.2001 and 30.04.1999 passed by the Courts below whereby, a suit for declaration and permanent injunction assailing the validity of order dated 24.08.1993 was dismissed by the Courts below vide which @Rs.1000 per month towards appellant-plaintiff. hat appellant is no more and despite having made all sincere efforts, no one is coming forward to In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal is dismissed for Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2002 AUGUST 07, 2026 appeal, challenge has been laid to dated 10.10.2001 and 30.04.1999 passed by the permanent injunction assailing the validity of order Courts below vide which @Rs.1000 per month towards hat appellant is no more and despite having made all sincere efforts, no one is coming forward to In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal is dismissed for TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.08.10 16:43 I agree to specified portions of this document