RFA-3696-1993 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 RFA-3696-1993 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 Rupali and others …Appellants Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Adarsh Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamaldeep Kaur, Advocate for the appellants Mr. Abhinash Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana [assisted by Mr. Davinder, Naib Tehsildar (Surplus), Panipat] *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The appellants through instant appeal are seeking modification of award dated 21.10.1993 whereby learned Additional District Judge, Panipat has not awarded compensation as claimed by them. 2. Learned Senior counsel for the appellants, at the outset, submits that appellants were owners of the acquired land. They have not been paid compensation because their land was declared surplus prior to the acquisition. They are entitled to compensation under Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 (for short ‘1953 Act’). They did not claim compensation under aforesaid Act because they were claiming compensation under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘1894 Act’). They do not press their claim under 1894 Act, however, their claim may be considered under 1953 Act. 3. Learned State counsel submits that appellants have not filed their claim under 1953 Act. If they file application/claim, their case would be considered in accordance with the law. MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RFA-3696-1993 -2- 4. Learned Senior counsel for the appellants agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the appeal stands disposed of. The appellants are at liberty to move an appropriate application under 1953 Act which shall be considered by the respondent in accordance with the law. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.07.2026 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.