Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RFA-3280-1993 (O&M) & RFA-4-1994 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-3280-1993 (O&M) & RFA-4-1994 Date of decision: 24.02.2026 Rajwant Singh ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Ni.n Goswami, Advocate for Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for appellant in RFA-3280-1993 and for respondent No.5 in RFA-4-1994. Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for appellant in RFA-4-1994 and for respondent Nos.4 and 5 in RFA-3280-1993. Mr. V.S. Mahal, Advocate for Mr. P.K. Mutneja, Sr. Advocate for respondent No.3. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellants in both the appeals submits that most of the appellants - tenants have expired; that the amount to be appor.oned amongst them is quite small and that both these appeals may be disposed of, with liberty to the appellants/their LRs that they can get the same revived, in case any cause of ac.on survives. In view of the aforesaid statement, both these appeals stand
disposed of with liberty as aforesaid. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. 24.02.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.02.24 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document