Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

1991 DAILYLAW 1 (JK)

ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/1991/2026 · 2026-07-06

Sanjay Parihar

Writ Petition (Civil)body1991

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1991/2026 Ashok Kumar and others …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Jasbir Singh Jasrotia, Advocate vs UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 06.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently argued, though in terms of the directions passed by the Revenue Authority, the Tehsildar, Maralian has conducted the demarcation of land measuring 18 kanals under Khasra No. 272 allotted in favour of Late Sh. Khayali Ram at Village Bansultan, Tehsil R. S. Pura, Jammu, however, said demarcation report is incomplete and the land has not been properly demarcated. He further contended that the petition can be disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the issue of demarcation afresh. 2. Having regard to the submissions made in this petition, and without commenting upon the merits of the demarcation report that has already been recorded by the Revenue Authority on 14.03.2026, the grievances of the petitioners can be redressed by the respondents, especially respondent Nos. 3 to 6, by considering the demarcation of the disputed land afresh after providing an opportunity of being heard to all the contesting parties. Serial No. 163 2 WP(C) No. 1991/2026 3. Disposed of in the above manner. 4. It is expected that the grievances of the petitioners shall be redressed within a period of three months, strictly as per the law governing the subject. (Sanjay Parihar) Judge Jammu 06.07.2026 Diksha