ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1991/2026 · 2026-07-06
Sanjay Parihar
Writ Petition (Civil)body1991
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1991 DAILYLAW 1 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1991 DAILYLAW 1 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1991/2026
Ashok Kumar and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Jasbir Singh Jasrotia, Advocate
vs
UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 06.07.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently argued, though in terms of the directions passed by the Revenue Authority, the Tehsildar, Maralian has conducted the demarcation of land measuring 18 kanals under Khasra No. 272 allotted in favour of Late Sh. Khayali Ram at Village Bansultan, Tehsil R. S. Pura, Jammu, however, said demarcation report is incomplete and the land has not been properly demarcated. He further contended that the petition can be disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the issue of demarcation afresh.
2. Having regard to the submissions made in this petition, and without commenting upon the merits of the demarcation report that has already been recorded by the Revenue Authority on 14.03.2026, the grievances of the petitioners can be redressed by the respondents, especially respondent Nos. 3 to 6, by considering the demarcation of the disputed land afresh after providing an opportunity of being heard to all the contesting parties. Serial No. 163
2 WP(C) No. 1991/2026
3.
Disposed of in the above manner.
4. It is expected that the grievances of the petitioners shall be redressed within a period of three months, strictly as per the law governing the subject.
(Sanjay Parihar)
Judge
Jammu 06.07.2026 Diksha