MANNAVA KIRAN KUMAR, GUNTUR DT., v. THE STATE OF AP., REP PP AND ANR.,
CRLRC/1983/2016 · 2026-04-26
Subhendu Samanta
body1983
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1983 DAILYLAW 1 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1983 DAILYLAW 1 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010603252016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1983/2016 Between:
1. MANNAVA KIRAN KUMAR, GUNTUR DT.,, S/O MANNAVA RAMULU, OCC: SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O D.NO. 7-507(12), TIPPARALA BAZAAR, MANGALAGIRI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD.
2. MANNAVA VINITHA JONES, W/O MANNAVA KIRAN KUMAR, D/O BUDALA DANIEL, CARE AND PROTECTION OF THE PARENTS, R/O D.NO. 6-1/9-10, BUDALAVARI STREET, FRIZERPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside and revise the judgment order 28-06-2016 in M.C. No.232/2012 on the file of the Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge's Court at Vijayawada, Krishna District.
IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 2910 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the judgment order dated 28-06-2016 in M.C. No.232/2012 on the file
2
of the Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge's Court at Vijayawada, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above revision case and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1983/2016 The Court made the following:
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and, therefore, it is not necessary to proceed further in this Criminal Revision Case.
Taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision case is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:27.04.2026 SSA