IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.499 of 1981 ====================================================== 1. Shri Sheo Dyal Prasad Son of Ram Sewak Mahto Resident of Village- Nanhkar, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. 2. Shri Gyanchand Pd. Son of Ram Sevak Mahto Resident of Village- Nanhkar, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. 3. Shri Gopalji Prasad, Son of Ram Sewak Mahto Resident of Village- Nanhkar, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. State Bank of India a Bank constituted under the State Bank of India, Act 1955, having its Central Office at Bombay, a Local Head Office at Patna and Branches All Over India including one at Motihari through Shri R.B. Pandey, Branch Manager, A.D. Branch, Motihari, P.O. and P.S.- Motihari, District- East Champaran. 2. Shri Basudeo Singh, Son of Nathu Singh Resident of Village- Narha Panapur, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. 3. Shri Yogi Singh, Son of Nathu Singh Resident of Village- Narha Panapur, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. 4. Shri Bhagya Narain Singh, Son of Nathu Singh Resident of Village- Narha Panapur, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None For the State Bank of India : Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 18 04-05-2026 Nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents-Bank is present. 2. On two dates i.e., on 16.03.2026 and 20.04.2026, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants. 3. On perusal of the records, it appears that this First Patna High Court FA No.499 of 1981(18) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 Appeal is of the year 1981 and the appellants are absented from two dates and even today, on repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the appellants to press this application. 4. In view of the above circumstances, it appears that the appellants have lost their interest to contest the present First Appeal No. 499 of 1981. 5. Accordingly, the present First Appeal No. 499 of 1981 is dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Anand Kr. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U