Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

1981 DAILYLAW 177 (PAT)

The Union of India v. Rakesh Raushan

CWJC/1981/2026 · 2026-04-21

Arun Kumar Jha, Mohit Kumar Shah

body1981

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1981 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, PO-Digghi Kala, P.S.-Hip (Town), District-Vaishali at Hajipur, Pin Code-841001. 2. The Principal Chief Commercial Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur, Post-Khagaul, District-Patna-801105 (Bihar). 3. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur, Post- Khagaul, District-Patna-801105 (Bihar). 4. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur, Post-Khagaul, District-Patna-801105 (Bihar). 5. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Danapur, Post-Khagaul, District-Patna-801105 (Bihar). 6. The Senior Divisional Finance Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur, Post-Khagaul, District-Patna-801105 (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus Rakesh Raushan Son of Sri Indra Deo Prasad, Deputy Chief Inspector of Tickets, East Central Railway, Rajendra Nagar, Patna, Resident of Chanakya Nagar, Kumhrar, District-Patna-800026 (Bihar). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, CGC For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH) 3 21-04-2026 Though the present writ petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 08.07.2025, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna in OA/050/00846/2024 whereby and whereunder the original Patna High Court CWJC No.1981 of 2026(3) dt.21-04-2026 2/2 application has been allowed and the impugned order dated 14.03.2024 has been set aside, however the learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that the period of two years for which the petitioner was debarred from working in all premium and express trains by the said order dated 14.03.2024, has already expired, whereafter the petitioner has been posted in premium and express trains. Therefore, it is submitted that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous during the interregnum period, thus the same be disposed of. 2. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. kanchan/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U