CM-7274-C RSA-1979- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 Mastan Singh M/s Mela Ram CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Order XXIII Rule main appeal (Annexure A 2. 3. notice on behalf of non objection’, in case the present application is allowed. 4. against the District Courts whereby the suit for plaintiff/respondent(s) 5. dispute which amicably C-2026 in -2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM- RSA Date of Decision: Mastan Singh Versus M/s Mela Ram and sons CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Akash Manocha, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the application (CM Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC, is for main appeal in view of Compromise/Settlement (Annexure A-1) arrived at between the parties. Notice of the application to learned counsel opposite. Mr. PPS Tung, Advocate who is notice on behalf of non-applicant/respondent(s) and has pleaded ‘no ’, in case the present application is allowed. Briefly stated, the defendant/appellant is against the concurrent judgments and decree District Courts whereby the suit for /respondent(s) was decreed. Learned counsel for the parties are dispute which is the subject matter of the present settled between the parties IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH - 7274-C-2026 in RSA-1979-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Akash Manocha, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. CM-7274-C-2026) filed under read with Section 151 CPC, is for withdrawal of the Compromise/Settlement dated 21.03.2026 arrived at between the parties. Notice of the application to learned counsel opposite. Mr. PPS Tung, Advocate who is present in Court accepts applicant/respondent(s) and has pleaded ‘no ’, in case the present application is allowed. /appellant is in second appeal concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the District Courts whereby the suit for recovery filed by the Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the entire the present second appeal, stands to their satisfaction as per filed under withdrawal of the 21.03.2026 present in Court accepts applicant/respondent(s) and has pleaded ‘no in second appeal s rendered by both the filed by the the entire as per RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CM-7274-C RSA-1979- Compromise/Settlement dated nothing survives in the main for the applicant/appellant main second 6. 7. application same is allowed; from 13.07.2026 2026) is dismissed as withdrawn 8. 9. terms and conditions of the aforesaid 21.03.2026 (Annexure A 26.05.2026 rishu C-2026 in -2011 (O&M) -2- Compromise/Settlement dated 21.03.2026 (Annexure A nothing survives in the main second appeal for the applicant/appellant prays that he may second appeal. Heard. In view of the above and for the reasons mentioned in the application (CM-7274-C-2026) which is supported by an affidavit, the allowed; and the date of hearing in the 13.07.2026 to today itself. The main second appeal (RSA dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. It is needless to say that both the parties shall abide by the terms and conditions of the aforesaid .03.2026 (Annexure A-1). 6.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 21.03.2026 (Annexure A-1). As such, second appeal. Accordingly, learned counsel prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the In view of the above and for the reasons mentioned in the which is supported by an affidavit, the and the date of hearing in the main appeal is preponed main second appeal (RSA-1979- Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. It is needless to say that both the parties shall abide by the terms and conditions of the aforesaid Compromise/Settlement dated ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No . As such, sel be permitted to withdraw the In view of the above and for the reasons mentioned in the which is supported by an affidavit, the main appeal is preponed It is needless to say that both the parties shall abide by the Settlement dated RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.