208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1979-2002 Date of Decision: May 12, 2026 Jagmal Singh and another … Appellants Versus Sher Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellants. None for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate for respondent No.4-Insurance Company. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) There is no representa!on either on behalf of the appellants or on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Same was the posi!on on the previous date of hearing. It is despite the fact that the counsel for the appellants as well as counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 have been duly informed through their respec!ve e-mails, in compliance of the previous order as reported by the Registry. The aforesaid circumstances indicate that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu!on. May 12, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.05.12 17:09 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order