CWP-29818 IN TH 234 Kashmir Sing Managing Di CORAM: Present : HARPREET 1. of the Consti the nature of the petitioner 2. petitioner joi 17.07.1979. Section 15 o acquitted by 1 818-2022 N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGA CWP Date ir Singh VERSUS ing Director, PRTC, Patiala and anoth HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate for th Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate fo Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for re REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present writ petition has be Constitution of India for issuance of ure of mandamus directing the respon itioner. Learned counsel for the petition ner joined the service of respondent N 979. Thereafter, a false case was 15 of the NDPS Act on 02.10.2007 ed by the learned Trial Court. Aggrie NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH CWP-29818-2022 Date of Decision: January 29, 2026 .....Petitioner SUS another ..Responden HARPREET SINGH BRAR e for the petitioner. cate for respondent No.1. for respondent No.2. been filed under Article 226/227 ce of an appropriate writ or order in respondents to release the pension of etitioner, inter alia, contends that the ent No.1 as an Assistant Tyreman on was registered against him under .2007. Ultimately, the petitioner was Aggrieved by the disciplinary action, 2026 itioner ondents /227 der in ion of at the an on under r was ction, PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.01.31 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-29818 including his 2013, titled Corporation dated 15.10.2 petition and with continui back wages f of the said Learned cou application, t by responden 13.02.2022 ( (Annexure P respondent N details of the to 30.01.2015 3. joining of th claim in For requisite deta processed e provisions. 4. that responde 2 818-2022 ng his dismissal from service, the peti titled as Kashmir Singh Versus tion and others, decided on 15.10.20 5.10.2018 (Annexure P-1), this Hon’ n and directed the respondents to rei ontinuity of service; however, the pet ages for the period he remained out o said writ petition, the petitioner d counsel further submits that despi tion, the pensionary benefits of the pe ondent No.1. Consequently, the petiti 022 (Annexure P-2), followed by ure P-4), seeking release of his pen dent No.2 pertains to the alleged non of the petitioner by respondent No.1 1.2015. Learned counsel for respondent of the petitioner is 01.09.1980 and in Form-10D is submitted through re te details for release of admissible ret sed expeditiously in accordance w On the other hand, learned coun spondent No.1 has already communica he petitioner filed CWP No.17187 of rsus Pepsu Roadways Transport 5.10.2018 (Annexure P-1). Vide order Hon’ble Court allowed the said writ to reinstate the petitioner in service he petitioner was held not entitled to d out of service. During the pendency oner superannuated on 30.01.2015. despite submission of the requisite the petitioner have not been released petitioner served a legal notice dated d by a reminder dated 01.08.2022 is pension. The objection raised by d non-submission of relevant service No.1 for the period from 19.03.2009 ondent No.2 submits that the date of and that as and when the complete ugh respondent No.1 along with the ble retiral benefits, the same shall be nce with the applicable statutory counsel for respondent No.1 submits municated with respondent No.2 vide 87 of port order d writ ervice led to dency .2015. uisite leased dated .2022 ed by ervice .2009 ate of plete th the all be tutory bmits 2 vide PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.01.31 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-29818 letter dated 1 fund was ma service due t of CWP No.1 that this Cou the period du further infor petitioner’s c 5. No.1 supplie learned coun counsel for communicati order passed petitioner for weeks. 6. writ petition the aforesaid CWP No.171 within a peri this order for 3 818-2022 ated 19.01.2026, informing them that as made from the salary of the pet due to his removal. It is further subm P No.17187 of 2013, the petitioner su is Court, vide order dated 15.10.2018 iod during which the petitioner remai information is required by respon ner’s claim. During the course of arguments, plied a copy of the letter/communi counsel for respondent No.2 in C l for respondent No.2 submits tha nication received from respondent N passed by this Court in CWP No.17 ner for release of pension shall be pr In view of the stand taken by th tition is disposed of with a direction resaid communication as well as the o.17187 of 2013 and to process the c a period of six weeks from the date o er for grant of admissible retiral benef that no deduction towards provident he petitioner as he remained out of r submitted that during the pendency ner superannuated on 30.01.2015 and 0.2018, did not grant back wages for remained out of service. As such, no respondent No.2 for processing the ments, learned counsel for respondent mmunication dated 19.01.2026 to the in Court itself. Upon this, learned its that on the basis of the said dent No.1, as well as in view of the No.17187 of 2013, the case of the be processed within a period of six the respective parties, the present ection to respondent No.2 to consider as the order passed by this Court in s the case of the petitioner positively date of receipt of a certified copy of l benefits. vident out of dency 5 and es for ch, no g the ndent to the arned said of the of the of six resent nsider urt in itively py of PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.01.31 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-29818 7. Fund Commi 8. January 29 P.C 4 818-2022 Personal appearance of respon ommissioner-II, Chandigarh is hereby Pending application(s), if any, 29, 2026 Whether speaking/reasone Whether Reportable. : respondent No.2-Regional Provident hereby exempted. any, shall also stand(s) disposed of. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE easoned. : Yes/No Yes/No vident ed of. RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.01.31 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document