IN TH (208) Nihal Singh State of Punj CORAM : Present:- RAMESH C 1. petitioner un Penal Code, District Hosh 2. presented. A of the Code fledged trial the trial, thro Magistrate, 304-A of th sentenced in Section 304-A of 1860 Code 279 of 1860 Code IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Singh Versus f Punjab M : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RA Mr.S.S.Hira, Advocate, for the p Mr.Raghav Garg, AAG, Punjab ESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) An FIR No.190 dated 09.09.20 ner under Sections 279, 304-A, 427 Code, 1860 (for brevity, “1860 Code t Hoshiarpur. On completion of investigation, ted. After complying with the provis Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (f d trial was conducted against him. A al, through a judgment dated 01.11.20 trate, 1st Class Dasuya, he was conv of the 1860 Code. Through an ord ced in following terms:- Sentence Fine (in R of ode Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years Rs.1000/ further un for 1 mon of ode Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 6 months Rs.500/ further un for 1 mon UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH CRR-1426-2010 Decided on: 27.02.2026 ……Petitioner ..…Respondent RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI or the petitioner. unjab. ral) : .09.2001 was registered against the , 427, 337 and 338 of the Indian Code”) at Police Station Tanda in gation, a final report against him was provisions contained in Section 207 973 (for brevity “1973 Code”), full- m. After completion of evidence in .11.2008 passed by Learned Judicial convicted under Sections 279 and an order of that very date, he was e (in Rs.) .1000/- and in default thereof to ther undergo rigorous imprisonment 1 month .500/- and in default thereof to ther undergo rigorous imprisonment 1 month t the dian a in was 207 - ce in icial and was f to ment f to ment SAILESH RANJAN 2026.03.07 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document bottom left CRR-1426-2010 -2- 3. He filed appeal against said judgment/order of conviction/sentence. While suspending the sentence of the petitioner, the Learned Appellate Court, vide order dated 01.12.2008, recorded that the petitioner has paid the fine. His such appeal was however dismissed on 30.04.2010. Aggrieved, he filed the present revision. 4. Today, Mr.Raghav Garg, AAG, Punjab has filed a short reply by way of affidavit of Shri Davinder Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Tanda, District Hoshiarpur, as per which petitioner expired in the year 2017. 5. In view of such short reply, since petitioner had already paid the imposed fine, sentence of imprisonment awarded to him stands abated and in turn, present revision petition also. It is accordingly disposed of as abated. 27.02.2026 (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) Sailesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No SAILESH RANJAN 2026.03.07 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document bottom left