! 
 SUBHAS MEHLA           
 ! "#$ % &       ' ((( SUBHAS MEHLA " ! '     )  !   *+,## - .! && #/012*0,3,'''31,3,3") ! ',31,3,'$" 45'$ !  
6 !!  -  !   . ,  ,73',3,1) #5    #!!% %85
Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') seeking quashing of complaint bearing No.NACT/594/2021 dated 11.05.2020 (filed on 12.05.2021) titled as 'Raj Rani Vs. Ahuja Gift House and another and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the complaint (supra), as he has no concern with the partnership firm i.e. Ahuja Gift House, Kotkapura, District Faridkot. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to Registration Certificate (Annexure P-3) and submits that the aforementioned partnership firm is managed by Devinder Singh and Harinder Singh and the petitioner has neither MAMTA 2026.02.16 20:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
   issued the cheque in question nor it is issued from his account. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that it has been specifically pleaded in para Nos.1 & 2 of the complaint (supra) that the petitioner was approached by complainant-respondent No.1 and he was present at the shop along with his father Harinder Singh and the cheque in question was issued by the petitioner and now he is denying that he has not signed the same. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 refers to Annexure P-4 to submit that the petitioner issued the cheque in question. In view of the above, learned trial Court is directed to invoke the provisions of Section 311-A of Cr.P.C. and direct the petitioner to give his specimen signatures and also to obtain his admitted signatures from his bank account or from any other relevant source and thereafter, send the same to alonh with the cheque State Forensic Science Laboratory for comparison along with the cheque to ascertain whether the cheque in question was signed by the petitioner or not. Adjourned to 16.05.2025. Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to learned trial Court for compliance.” 7 #.!        ,9'3,3,1     ) :  !  ;!< =  >   % .   %     . ..  %   !)!    !)         -     ! !      ?!  &      ,'3*,3,'      )!     .!  / . 
6>=@  < =  4       -) . = % ) .!  /    !5 MAMTA 2026.02.16 20:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
       %    . % .- -  %  * =          %  )  . !    .)  #   .        - .! && #/012*0,3,'''31,3,3 ") ! ',31,3,'$" 45'$ !  
 6  !! -  !   .    . )  .   (SUBHAS MEHLA) mamta JUDGE A= 0  B0& A)! B0& MAMTA 2026.02.16 20:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document