Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1973 DAILYLAW 10 (PNJ)

ANCHAL SINGH SALARIA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/61837/2025 · 2026-02-09

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body1973

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 150 Anchal Singh Salaria State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. for the petitioner Ms. Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Section Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) No.42 dated 15.05.2024 registered under Section Penal Code, 1860 all consequential proceedings arising therefrom 2. After arguing the matter at some length, l appearing on behalf of the petitioner the instant petition at this stage so as to take all pleas before the Trial Court at an appropriate stage. He however contends that the petitioner is a senior citizen undergoing cardiac problems. 3. The petitioner may, if so application for seeking exemption, before the Trial Court. In the event of such an application being moved, the Trial Court shall take appropriate decision on such a request in totality of circumstances. 4. not pressed with liberty 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 09.02.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-61837 Date of decision: Anchal Singh Salaria VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. S.K. Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Section Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) for seeking quashing of No.42 dated 15.05.2024 registered under Section Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Taragarh, District Pathankot alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. After arguing the matter at some length, l appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the instant petition at this stage so as to take all pleas before the Trial Court at an appropriate stage. He however contends that the petitioner is a senior citizen undergoing cardiac problems. The petitioner may, if so advised, move an appropriate application for seeking exemption, before the Trial Court. In the event of such an application being moved, the Trial Court shall take appropriate decision on such a request in totality of circumstances. In view of the above, the present petition is not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 61837-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Section 528 of the Bharatiya for seeking quashing of case bearing FIR No.42 dated 15.05.2024 registered under Sections188 & 435 of the Indian at Police Station Taragarh, District Pathankot alongwith . After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel that he does not want to press the instant petition at this stage so as to take all pleas before the Trial Court at an appropriate stage. He however contends that the petitioner is a senior advised, move an appropriate application for seeking exemption, before the Trial Court. In the event of such an application being moved, the Trial Court shall take appropriate decision on such a request in totality of circumstances. ove, the present petition is disposed of as Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.10 20:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document