IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (104) VINEY KUMAR SHARMA VS TARSEM SINGH BHINDER & ANOTHER CORAM : Present: AMARJOT BHATTI, J. 1. of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully violating the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.368 of 2026 (SLP)(C) No.24811 of 2025 (Annexure P-1) titled as “ another”. 2. 3. appeared and filed Power of Attorney on behalf of the respondent(s) and stated that compliance of impugned orde (Annexure P 4. petitioner states that there is not full compliance to the aforesaid order and the petitioner wants to approach the Court of India in t IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VINEY KUMAR SHARMA VS Versus TARSEM SINGH BHINDER & ANOTHER CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advocate Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, for respondent-Improvement Trust, Ludhiana. AMARJOT BHATTI, J.(Oral) Petitioner has filed Contempt petition under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully violating the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.368 of 2026 (SLP)(C) No.24811 of 2025 (Annexure titled as “Viney Kumar Sharma vs. The Improvement Trust and another”. Notice of motion. On advance notice, Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, has appeared and filed Power of Attorney on behalf of the respondent(s) and stated that compliance of impugned orde (Annexure P-1) has been done. On the other hand, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that there is not full compliance to the aforesaid order and the petitioner wants to approach the Court of India in this regard. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2466 of 2026 Decided on :27.07.2026 ……Petitioner TARSEM SINGH BHINDER & ANOTHER …Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI , Advocate, for the petitioner. Improvement Trust, Ludhiana. Petitioner has filed Contempt petition under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully violating the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.368 of 2026 (SLP)(C) No.24811 of 2025 (Annexure Viney Kumar Sharma vs. The Improvement Trust and On advance notice, Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, has appeared and filed Power of Attorney on behalf of the respondent(s) and stated that compliance of impugned order dated 16.01.2026 On the other hand, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that there is not full compliance to the aforesaid order and the petitioner wants to approach the Hon’ble Supreme Petitioner has filed Contempt petition under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully violating the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.368 of 2026 (SLP)(C) No.24811 of 2025 (Annexure Viney Kumar Sharma vs. The Improvement Trust and On advance notice, Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, has appeared and filed Power of Attorney on behalf of the respondent(s) r dated 16.01.2026 On the other hand, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that there is not full compliance to the aforesaid Supreme NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.28 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP No.2466 of 2026 -2- 5. At this stage, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition and accordingly withdraws the same. 6. In view of the aforesaid factual position, the present contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI ) July 27, 2026 JUDGE nt Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.28 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document