HARINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS v. KAP SINHA, IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/2502/2026 · 2026-07-20
Amarjot Bhatti
Contempt Petitionbody1971
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1971 DAILYLAW 12 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1971 DAILYLAW 12 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
PHHC010853622026
(107) Harinder Kumar and others Kap Sinha, IAS and others
CORAM :
Present:
AMARJOT BHATTI
1.
the Constitution of India read with Sections 10 and 11 Courts Act, 1971 for
judgment dated (Annexure P-
2.
LPA No.980 of 2026 titled “State of Punjab and others vs. Harinder Kumar and others” has been decided on 15.07.2026. Copy thereof supplied to learne
3.
Single Judge. petitioners states that he does not want to press the present contempt petit and accordingly withdraws the same.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
PHHC010853622026
Harinder Kumar and others
Versus Kap Sinha, IAS and others
HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Mr. Ranjivan Singh, Advocate and Mr. Navjot Singh Kalsia, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab
AMARJOT BHATTI (Oral): Petitioners have filed Contempt petition under the Constitution of India read with Sections 10 and 11 Courts Act, 1971 for willful non-compliance/ dated 19.11.2025 passed in Civil Writ Petition -1).
Learned counsel representing the LPA No.980 of 2026 titled “State of Punjab and others vs. Harinder Kumar and others” has been decided on 15.07.2026. Copy thereof supplied to learned counsel representing the petitioners. As per this order, the case has been remanded back to learned Single Judge. Therefore, at this stage, learned counsel representing the petitioners states that he does not want to press the present contempt petit and accordingly withdraws the same.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2502 of 2026 Decided on : 20.07.2026
……Petitioners
……Respondents AMARJOT BHATTI and Mr. Navjot Singh Kalsia, Advocate Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab Petitioners have filed Contempt petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 10 and 11 of Contempt of compliance/disobedience of common passed in Civil Writ Petition No.27166 of 2018
Learned counsel representing the State of Punjab states that LPA No.980 of 2026 titled “State of Punjab and others vs. Harinder Kumar and others” has been decided on 15.07.2026. Copy thereof has been d counsel representing the petitioners. As per this order, the case has been remanded back to learned Therefore, at this stage, learned counsel representing the petitioners states that he does not want to press the present contempt petition
Article 215 of of Contempt of common 27166 of 2018 states that LPA No.980 of 2026 titled “State of Punjab and others vs. Harinder Kumar has been As per this order, the case has been remanded back to learned Therefore, at this stage, learned counsel representing the ion NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.21 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP No.2502 of 2026
-2-
4.
In view of the statement, the present contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
5.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
(AMARJOT BHATTI) July 20, 2026
JUDGE Nt
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.21 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document