RANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA v. ARUN KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS
COCP/1968/2026 · 2026-04-30
Nidhi Gupta
Contempt Petitionbody1968
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1968 DAILYLAW 6 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1968 DAILYLAW 6 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 105
Ranjeev K
Arun Kum
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
violation o Division Mishra and
disposed o passed by
“Rohtash a respondent
directed to colly.) or accordance an opportu months fro COCP-1968-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.1968 o
Date of decision jeev Kumar Sharma Versus Kumar Gupta, IAS and others
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mr. Mannu Chaudhary, Advoc for the petitioner.
Mr. Harmanjit Singh, Advocat HI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Present contempt petition tion of order dated 03.7.2015 (An sion Bench of this Court in CWP-13 ra and others vs. The State of Harya sed of in terms of the order of the ed by the same Division Bench in tash and others vs. The State of Hary ndent No.3 therein or any other offi ted to “…take a decision on the claim or other similar representations f ance with law by passing a speakin ortunity of hearing to the petitione s from the date of receipt of certified
1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1968 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-30.04.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA Advocate dvocate for the respondents. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a 13023-2015 titled as “Baby Haryana and others”, which was of the same date i.e. 03.7.2015 ch in CWP-9983-2015 titled as f Haryana and others”, whereby, er office authorized by him was claim petitions (Annexure P-10 ns filed by the petitioners, in aking order and after affording itioners within a period of two ified copy of the order.” VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 18.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
counsel for impleaded the petition with liberty
April 30, 2 Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
COCP-1968-2026 (O & M)
At the very outset, when it ha sel for the respondents that the neces eaded as party respondents by the pet etitioner prays for withdrawal of the liberty to file fresh one with better par
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with
Pending application(s), if any, , 2026
r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No
2 n it has been informed by learned necessary parties have not been he petitioner, learned counsel for of the present contempt petition ter particulars. with the liberty aforesaid. if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 18.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document