Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1968 DAILYLAW 6 (PNJ)

RANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA v. ARUN KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS

COCP/1968/2026 · 2026-04-30

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody1968

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 105 Ranjeev K Arun Kum CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o Division Mishra and disposed o passed by “Rohtash a respondent directed to colly.) or accordance an opportu months fro COCP-1968-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1968 o Date of decision jeev Kumar Sharma Versus Kumar Gupta, IAS and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Mannu Chaudhary, Advoc for the petitioner. Mr. Harmanjit Singh, Advocat HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 03.7.2015 (An sion Bench of this Court in CWP-13 ra and others vs. The State of Harya sed of in terms of the order of the ed by the same Division Bench in tash and others vs. The State of Hary ndent No.3 therein or any other offi ted to “…take a decision on the claim or other similar representations f ance with law by passing a speakin ortunity of hearing to the petitione s from the date of receipt of certified 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1968 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-30.04.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA Advocate dvocate for the respondents. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a 13023-2015 titled as “Baby Haryana and others”, which was of the same date i.e. 03.7.2015 ch in CWP-9983-2015 titled as f Haryana and others”, whereby, er office authorized by him was claim petitions (Annexure P-10 ns filed by the petitioners, in aking order and after affording itioners within a period of two ified copy of the order.” VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 18.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document counsel for impleaded the petition with liberty April 30, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-1968-2026 (O & M) At the very outset, when it ha sel for the respondents that the neces eaded as party respondents by the pet etitioner prays for withdrawal of the liberty to file fresh one with better par Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 n it has been informed by learned necessary parties have not been he petitioner, learned counsel for of the present contempt petition ter particulars. with the liberty aforesaid. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 18.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document