ANIKET S/O MOHAN GIRI v. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DARWHA, YAVATMAL AND OTHERS
WP/1966/2026 · 2026-06-17
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
body1966
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1966 DAILYLAW 110 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1966 DAILYLAW 110 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 28.wp.1966.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1966 OF 2026 Aniket S/o Mohan Giri .Vs. SDO, Darwha, Yavatmal and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. R.J. Shinde, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. Mrunal Barabde, A.G.P. for respondents/State.
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 17/06/2026
1. The present petition is filed in order to challenge order dated 26.06.2025 passed by the Sub- Divisional officer, Darwha, in Revision Case No.37/MCA-5/2022-23 of Mouza Nimbha, Tah. Darwha, Dist. Yavatmal and order dated 12.04.2023 passed by the Naib Tahsildar, Darwha, in Revision Case No.10/MCA-5/2022-23 of Mouza Nimbha, Tah. Darwha.
2.
By impugned order passed under Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906, the Mamlatdar has passed an order for removal of obstruction on road. The Sub-Divisional Officer has maintained the order by dismissing the revision. The only contention canvassed before this Court is that the respondent No.2/plaintiff before the Mamlatdar, has an alternate approach for his agricultural land. I am afraid that the existence of alternate road cannot be a ground for obstructing an existing approach way. 2026:BHC-NAG:7756
2 28.wp.1966.2026.odt
3.
In view of the aforesaid, the impugned orders do not call for any interference. Writ Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) C.L. Dhakate