DELHI ARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA HAVING ITS REGISTERED v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMS/1965/2021 · 2026-03-10
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body1965
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1965 DAILYLAW 2 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1965 DAILYLAW 2 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/1965/2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent nos. 1 to 5.
3. Mr. M.C.Pant, Advocate for respondent no. 6.
4. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the order of even date passed in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1725 of 2016, he does not wish to press this writ petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly,
disposed of by providing that if Authorised Controller is managing the affairs of the institution in question, then he shall continue to do so till duly elected Committee of Management is put in place.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
10.03.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006 da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA87564 3AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.03.11 10:20:49 +05'30'