Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

1964 DAILYLAW 98 (BOM)

ANIL KRISHIN LULLA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/1964/2026 · 2026-09-03

body1964

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 2 20-wp-1964-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1964 OF 2026 Anil Krishna Lulla ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents __________ Mr. Anil Lulla, Petitioner-in-person a/w. Mr. Pravin Palhade, Suchitra Warang and Riddhi Gupta for Petitioner. Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for State/Respondent. Ms. Esha Joshi i/b. Aditya Mithe for the Respondent No.5. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 3 SEPTEMBER 2026 PC : 1. There are various prayers made in this petition. The Petitioner who appears as party in person has invited our attention to the prayer clause (x). He submitted that this is the main prayer in this petition and other prayers are infructuous. His statement is recorded. 2. Learned APP tendered a report dated 03.09.2026 signed by API Colaba police station, Mumbai. The last four lines of the report mention that in connection with C.R.No.76 of 2026, a non Gokhale VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date: 2026.09.07 11:25:25 +0530 2 of 2 20-wp-1964-26 cognizable summary is filed before a Court. In respect of C.C.No.2448/misc/2026, Amarjit Singh was informed that the application was in the nature of civil dispute and, therefore, he was advised to approach the Civil Court and that application was disposed of. 3. In view of this report, the Petitioner does not press this petition and it is disposed of. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)