IN T 107 David Aror Harmandee Mohali CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated this Court i and others” was directed 3) by passin receipt of c being retur representati independen petitioner a necessary co COCP-1961-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1961 of Date of decision : Arora Versus andeep Singh Hans, IPS, Senior AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Ms. Tejal Jangra, Advocate for Mr. Karamjeet Singh Brar, Advo for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG P SHO Amandeep Tarika, P.S. Mu I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 16.3.2026 (Annexure P-1) passe ourt in CRWP-2956-2026 titled as “Dav thers”, whereby writ petition was dispo irected to “…decide the representation o assing a Speaking Order within a perio of copy of instant order. It is, howeve eturned, by this Court, with regard ntation. The respondent No.3 shal dent assessment with regard to cont er and take an independent decision at Learned counsel for the res sary compliance has been made while pa 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 961 of 2026 (O & M) sion :-27.04.2026 …..Petitioner nior Superintendent of Police, …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA te for , Advocate AAG Punjab assisted by .S. Mullapur. has been filed alleging violation of passed by a co-ordinate Bench of s “David Arora vs. State of Punjab s disposed of and respondent No.3 ion of the petitioner (Annexure P- period of 15 days from the date of wever, clarified that no finding is ard to merits of the contents of shall be at liberty to make an contents of representation of the n at his own level.” e respondent-State submits that hile passing a Speaking Order dated VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.27 20.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 15.4.2026 i representati FIR No.005 351(2) and threatening the copy of for the respo learned cou appropriate Court order passing a S nothing sur disposed of. learned cou of. April 27, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-1961-2026 (O & M) 026 in compliance of the Writ Court sentation (Annexure P-3) of the petition o.0054 dated 30.3.2026 has been regis ) and 351(3) BNS has been registered a ening the petitioner; thus, no cause survi Copies of the aforesaid Speakin py of FIR No.0054 dated 30.3.2026 pro e respondent-State are taken on record. C d counsel for the petitioner. Registry priate place in the paper-book. Learned counsel for the petitione order dated 16.3.2026 (Annexure P-1) h a Speaking Order dated 15.4.2026 ng survives in the present contempt pe sed of. In view of the above noted facts d counsel for the petitioner, the present Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 Court order dated 16.3.2026. The etitioner has been decided and an registered under Sections 308(4), ered against Harry Boxer, who was survives in the present petition. peaking order dated 15.4.2026 and 26 produced by the learned counsel cord. Copies thereof are supplied to gistry to tag/paginate the same at etitioner submits that since the Writ 1) has been complied with while .2026 by the respondent-authority, pt petition and the same may be facts and the submissions made by esent contempt petition is disposed any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.27 20.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document