HARBIPONJOT SINGH AND SONS (HUF) v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
CWP/5028/2022 · 2026-07-21
Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated
body1961
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1961 DAILYLAW 35 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1961 DAILYLAW 35 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
307
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
HARBIPONJOT SINGH AND SONS (HUF)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar Mukhi, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel
Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Jr. Standing Counsel,
for the respondents.
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)
1.
Similar writ petitions challenging notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) have been disposed of by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated titled as ‘Sadashiv Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. relying upon judgment of the Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal, (2023) 1 SCC 617
2.
Another writ petition Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. under section 148 of the Act, on the specific grounds, has been dismissed by this Court today, vide separate orders.
3.
Learned counsel for th matters on the same issue, the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of order 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARBIPONJOT SINGH AND SONS (HUF)
Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
***** Mr. Sunil Kumar Mukhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Jr. Standing Counsel, for the respondents. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) Similar writ petitions challenging notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) have been disposed of by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated Sadashiv Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. relying upon judgment of the Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal, (2023) 1 SCC 617. Another writ petition No.CWP- Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Of India And Others under section 148 of the Act, on the specific grounds, has been dismissed by this Court today, vide separate orders.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in all connected matters on the same issue, the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-5028 5028 5028 5028----2022 2022 2022 2022(O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M)
Date of decision: 21.07.2026
....Petitioner
...Respondents HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
Mr. Sunil Kumar Mukhi, Advocate Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Jr. Standing Counsel, Similar writ petitions challenging notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) have been disposed of by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.04.2026 in CWP-4734-2022 Sadashiv Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and others’ relying upon judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. -21666-2021 titled as ‘Pure Milk Union Of India And Others’, challenging the notice under section 148 of the Act, on the specific grounds, has been dismissed by this e petitioner states that in all connected matters on the same issue, the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of order
Date of decision: 21.07.2026 ...Respondents Similar writ petitions challenging notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) have been disposed of by the 2022 s. Union of India and others’, Union of India and others vs. Pure Milk , challenging the notice under section 148 of the Act, on the specific grounds, has been dismissed by this e petitioner states that in all connected matters on the same issue, the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of order RENU SHARMA 2026.07.24 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
passed in Ashish Agarwal
4. In that view of the matter, this petition stands di of orders passed in
5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. 21.07.2026 Renu Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable 2
Ashish Agarwal (supra). This prayer of the petitioner is not opposed. In that view of the matter, this petition stands di of orders passed in Ashish Agarwal (supra). Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(ROHIT KAPOOR
Whether speaking/reasoned
: Yes / No Whether reportable
: Yes / No
(supra). This prayer of the petitioner is not opposed.
In that view of the matter, this petition stands disposed of in terms Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR)
JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No
(supra). This prayer of the petitioner is not opposed. sposed of in terms
RENU SHARMA 2026.07.24 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document