325 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA NITIN BHANDARI NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI AND ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar Mukhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Jr. Standing for the respondents. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. Similar writ petitions challenging notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) have been disposed of by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide titled as ‘Sadashiv Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. relying upon judgment of the Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal, (2023) 1 SCC 617 2. Another writ petition No Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. under section 148 of the Act, on the specific grounds, has been dismissed by this Court today, vide separate orders. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in all connected 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH NITIN BHANDARI Versus NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE AND ANR. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR ***** Mr. Sunil Kumar Mukhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Jr. Standing Counsel, for the respondents. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) Similar writ petitions challenging notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) have been disposed of by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.04.2026 in CWP Sadashiv Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. relying upon judgment of the Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal, (2023) 1 SCC 617. Another writ petition No.CWP- Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Of India And Others under section 148 of the Act, on the specific grounds, has been dismissed by this Court today, vide separate orders. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in all connected IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6493 6493 6493 6493----2022 2022 2022 2022 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of decision: 21.07.2026 ....Petitioner NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE TH. ADDITIONAL CIT, ...Respondents HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Sunil Kumar Mukhi, Advocate Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel Counsel, Similar writ petitions challenging notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) have been disposed of by the order dated 20.04.2026 in CWP-4734-2022 Sadashiv Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and others’ relying upon judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. -21666-2021 titled as ‘Pure Milk Union Of India And Others’, challenging the notice under section 148 of the Act, on the specific grounds, has been dismissed by this Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in all connected Date of decision: 21.07.2026 TH. ADDITIONAL CIT, ...Respondents Similar writ petitions challenging notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) have been disposed of by the 2022 s. Union of India and others’, Union of India and others vs. Pure Milk , challenging the notice under section 148 of the Act, on the specific grounds, has been dismissed by this Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in all connected RENU SHARMA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document matters on the same issue, the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of order passed in Ashish Agarwal 4. In that view of the matter, t of orders passed in 5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. 21.07.2026 Renu Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 matters on the same issue, the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of order Ashish Agarwal (supra). This prayer of the petitioner is not opposed. In that view of the matter, this petition stands disposed of in terms of orders passed in Ashish Agarwal (supra). Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No matters on the same issue, the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of order (supra). This prayer of the petitioner is not opposed. his petition stands disposed of in terms Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No matters on the same issue, the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of order (supra). This prayer of the petitioner is not opposed. his petition stands disposed of in terms RENU SHARMA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document