IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sajjan Kedia Income Tax Officer and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Amit Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Akshay Mittal, Advocat, for the respondent DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. May 27, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3306 Date of Decision : Versus Income Tax Officer and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Amit Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Akshay Mittal, Advocat, for the respondent-revenue. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3306-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.05.28 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document