CRM-M-65631- IN THE H (250) AJIT YADAV @ STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. J Ms. H MANISHA BATR 1. The p Section 483 of Bh for grant of regul registered under S Act, 1959 (Sectio Arms Act, 1959 Gurugram. 2. As pe the aforementione members of Law Lipan Nehra and P money from busin were operating fro -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH AV @ AJIT KUMAR Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the petit Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh regular bail in case arising out of F nder Sections 120-B, 386 and 506 of Section 384 of IPC and Sections 25( 1959 added later on) at Police S As per the allegations, on 10.05.2024 ntioned Police Station, received a f Lawrence Bishnoi gang, namely R and Pawan Nehra, were active in the businessmen and rich people. The ing from foreign countries, some of the JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-65631-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.01.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent
ANISHA BATRA
e petitioner preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) ut of FIR No.114 dated 10.05.2024 506 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms 25(1-B)a, 25(6), 29(b), 25(1a) of lice Station Farukhnagar, District .2024, ASI Sanjay Kumar posted at ed a secret information that some ely Rohit Godara, Naveen Boxer, in the city of Gurugram for extorting he main members of the group e of them were lodged in jails and all M) 2026
nder ) 2024 rms a) of strict ed at some oxer, rting roup d all AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.29 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-65631- of them were into It was also inform Goda in Rohtak. raised demand of r Store, Gurugram. members of the contraband, ransom basis of this inform proceedings were arrested on 10.05 countrymade pisto identification, co also arrested on 1 recovered. Accuse One vehicle used been recovered. Harpal, Karan @ accused-Lokesh K carbine weapon a statement on the accused and was a admitting his invo cartridges. Some stands completed commission of afo -2025 (O&M) 2 re into contact with each other throug informed that they had even got murd htak. One of the members of this ga nd of ransom money of Rs.2 crores fro gram. It was informed that if the abov f the gang were apprehended and in ransom money and weapons could be information, the aforementioned FIR were initiated. During investigation, 10.05.2024. Recovery of two m pistol alongwith five live cartridges w n, co-accused Jagdish @ Jaggu, Pard on 12.05.2024, from whom differen Accused Ritesh @ Arya and Himanshu used by accused HImanshu at the tim red. Subsequently, accused Rupesh an @ Kannu and Iqbal Singh @ Bill kesh Kumar was arrested on 06.02.2 pon alongwith magazine. On interro n the basis of which the present pe was arrested on 14.02.2025. He too is involvement in the crime and got Some other accused were arrested sub leted and the petitioner alongwith the of aforementioned offences. through different social media apps. t murdered one businessman Sachin this gang namely Rohit Godara had s from owner of Maniram Grocery e above mentioned persons and other and interrogated, huge quantity of uld be recovered from them. On the FIR was registered. Investigation gation, accused Dinesh @ Dinu was wo mobile phones, one .30 bore idges was effected from him. On his Pardeep, Sagar and Vishnu were ifferent arms and ammunitions were anshu were arrested on 18.05.2024. the time of committing offences had pesh @ Naman, Ashish @ Deva, Bill were arrested. Subsequently, 6.02.2025. He got recovered one interrogation, he suffered disclosure ent petitioner was nominated as an He too suffered disclosure statement d got recovered one pistol and five subsequently. Investigation now ith the co-accused is facing time for apps. chin had cery other ty of n the ation was bore s were were 024. had eva, ntly, one sure s an ment five now e for AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.29 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-65631- 3. It is a falsely implicated accused which ca recovery has been accused Vidyadha On parity, he too other cases canno him. He has a pe extended benefit o firearms and had s would be served petition deserves t 4. Status counsel has argue petitioner. He is h serious nature in absconding of com therefore, stressed 5. This both the parties. 6. The p in conspiracy wit cartridges from on -2025 (O&M) 3 It is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case on the basis of the d ich cannot be considered to be adm s been planted upon him. He is in yadhar, Himanshu, Jaiprakash have b e too deserves to be given the same cannot be considered to be a reason s a permanent abode. There are no nefit of bail. The only role attributed had supplied the same further to the c erved by his further incarceration. erves to be allowed. Status report has been filed by the re argued that there are serious and sp He is habitual offender being involved ure including two cases of murder. of committing similar offences, if ex ressed that the petitioner does not dese This Court has heard the rival subm The petitioner is alleged to be a mem cy with them is alleged to have rec om one unknown person and then to l for the petitioner that he has been f the disclosure statement of the co- e admissible in evidence. A false is in custody since long. The co- have been extended benefit of bail. same benefit. His involvement in eason for denying benefit of bail to re no chances of his absconding, if ibuted to him is that he had received o the co-accused. No useful purpose ion. It is, therefore, urged that the the respondent-State. Learned State and specific allegations against the olved in 08 other cases which are of urder. There are chances of his , if extended benefit of bail. It is, t deserve to be released on bail. l submissions made by counsel for a member of notorious gangsters and received one pistol and ten live en to have supplied the same to the been - false - bail. nt in il to g, if ived e t the State t the re of f his It is, l for s and live o the AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.29 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-65631- co-accused. He extortion of mon accused. He is in several other case Though the allega offences, however conclude since no purpose would be well settled propo Even otherwise pr sentencing. Keep considered opinion out. Accordingly released on regul bonds to the ext Court/Chief Judici conditions:-
(i) ind fac ma (ii) circ (iii hea -2025 (O&M) 4 He is alleged to have facilitated f money and extending threats to th e is in custody since 14.02.2025. Th r cases but he cannot be denied bene allegations prima facie make out a c wever, he is in custody for almost a ye ce not even a single witness has been uld be served by detaining the petitio proposition of law that the bail is the ise pre-trial incarceration should not Keeping in view the discussion as m pinion that a case for release of the pe dingly, the petition is allowed and th regular bail, subject to his furnishin e extent of two sureties to the sa Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate c (i) The petitioner shall not dire inducement, threat or promise to a facts of the case or tamper with th manner whatsoever.
(ii) The petitioner shall not le circumstance without permission of (iii) The petitioner shall appear b hearing.
litated commission of offences of to the public persons by the co- . Though he is involved to be in d benefit of bail due to that reason. ut a case for commission of subject st a year. The trial will take time to s been examined so far. No fruitful petitioner in custody anymore. It is l is the rule and jail is an exception. ld not be replica of post-conviction as made above, this Court is of the the petitioner on bail has been made and the petitioner is ordered to be rnishing personal as well as surety he satisfaction of the learned trial trate concerned and on the following t directly or indirectly make any se to any person acquainted with the with the evidence of the case in any not leave the country under any sion of the learned trial Court.
pear before each and every date of s of - be in ason. bject e to itful It is tion. ction f the ade o be urety trial wing any h the any any of AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.29 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-65631- (iv) resi info (v) num swi (vi) det his 7. It is construed as an ex shall not influence 8. Since any, is rendered in 29.01.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 5 (iv) The petitioner shall provide h residing after release and shall n informing the concerned IO/SHO. (v) The petitioner shall upon his r number to concerned IO/SHO and switched on all times.
(vi) The petitioner shall surrender details of his cell phone and Aadh his mobile number(s) during the pe It is clarified that the observation an expression of opinion of this Cour luence the outcome of the trial in any m Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous.
(MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
  
vide his address where he would be shall not change the same without SHO.
n his release give his mobile phone O and shall keep his mobile phone rrender his passport, if any, furnish Aadhar card, and shall not change the pendency of the trial.
vations made above shall not be s Court on the merits of the case and n any manner.
een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
ld be thout hone hone rnish ange t be and n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.29 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.