CRM-M-65615- IN THE H (248) SANJEEV @ FA STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. J Ms. H MANISHA BATR 1. The p Section 483 of Bh for grant of regul registered under S Act, 1959 (Sectio Arms Act, 1959 Gurugram. 2. As pe the aforementione members of Law Lipan Nehra and P -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH @ FAUJI KUMAR Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the petit Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh regular bail in case arising out of F nder Sections 120-B, 386 and 506 of Sections 384 of IPC and Section 25( 1959 added later on) at Police S As per the allegations, on 10.05.2024 ntioned Police Station, received a f Lawrence Bishnoi gang, namely R and Pawan Nehra, were active in the JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-65615-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.01.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA
e petitioner preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) ut of FIR No.114 dated 10.05.2024 506 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms n 25(1-B)a, 25(6), 29(b), 25(1a) of lice Station Farukhnagar, District .2024, ASI Sanjay Kumar posted at ed a secret information that some ely Rohit Godara, Naveen Boxer, in the city of Gurugram for extorting M) 2026 oner
dent
nder ) 2024 rms a) of strict ed at some oxer, rting AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-65615- money from busin operating from fo them were into co was also informed Goda in Rohtak. raised demand of Grocery Store, Gu and other membe quantity of contra them. On the bas Investigation pro @ Dinu was arres bore countrymade On his identificati were also arrested were recovered. T basis of which the was arrested on admitting his invo co-accused Pardee latter. He further made pistol and accused. Subs -2025 (O&M) 2 businessmen and rich people, the ma om foreign countries, some of them w into contact with each other through d formed that they had even got murd htak. One of the members of this ga and of ransom money of Rs.2 cror re, Gurugram. It was informed that if members of the gang were apprehe contraband, ransom money and weap he basis of this information, the aforem n proceedings were initiated. During s arrested on 10.05.2024. Recovery o ymade pistol alongwith five live cartr tification, co-accused Jagdish @ Jagg rrested on 12.05.2024, from whom di red. The co-accused Pardeep suffered ich the present petitioner was nomina on 14.02.2025. On interrogation, he is involvement in the crime and on 05 Pardeep, he had collected Rs.5 lakhs urther disclosed that on 17.08.2024, al and one pistol from a person as p Subsequently, some other co-ac the main members of the group were them were lodged in jails and all of ough different social media apps. It murdered one businessman Sachin this gang namely Rohit Godara had 2 crorers from owner of Maniram that if the above mentioned persons pprehended and interrogated, huge weapons could be recovered from aforementioned FIR was registered. uring investigation, accused Dinesh very of two mobile phones, one .30 e cartridges was effected from him. Jaggu, Pardeep, Sagar and Vishnu om different arms and ammunitions uffered a disclosure statement on the ominated as an accused and he too ion, he suffered disclosure statement on 05.07.2024, on the asking of the lakhs and had given the same to the also he had collected 02 country as per the instructions of the co- accused were also arrested. were ll of s. It chin had iram rsons huge from ered. inesh e .30 him. shnu tions n the e too ment f the o the untry - sted. AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-65615- Supplementary ch co-accused is facin 3. It is a falsely implicated accused which ca recovery has been material evidence he facilitated arms He is in custody s @ Dinu and Jay P of bail by this Co He has clean antec his absconding, i petition deserves t 4. Status respondent-State. gang operated by L the businessmen 05.07.2024, the pe to the co-accused. co-accused. Alleg his committing si urged that the peti -2025 (O&M) 3 ary challan was present against the pe is facing trial for commission of aforem It is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case on the basis of the d ich cannot be considered to be adm s been planted upon him jointly with dence has been produced by the Inve arms and money to the co-accused tody since long. Similarly situated co Jay Prakash @ Jay Prakash have alr his Court. On parity, he too deserves n antecedents. He has a permanent ab ing, if extended benefit of bail. It erves to be allowed. Status report and custody certifica State. Learned State counsel has arg ed by Lawrence Bishnoi, which is invo smen and professionals by extend the petitioner had received ransom m cused. He had facilitated the commiss Allegations against him are grave in ting similar offences, if extended ben e petitioner does not deserve to be rele the petitioner and he alongwith the aforementioned offences. l for the petitioner that he has been f the disclosure statement of the co- e admissible in evidence. A false y with the co-accused. There is no e Investigating Agency to show that cused as alleged by the prosecution. ated co-accused Vidhyadhar, Dinesh ave already been granted concession serves to be given the same benefit. ent abode. There are no chances of il. It is, therefore, urged that the ertificate have been filed by the as argued that he is a member of a is involved in extorting money from extending threats to them. On som money and had given the same mmission of subject offences by the ave in nature. There are chances of ed benefit of bail. It is, therefore, be released on bail. h the been - false is no that tion. inesh ssion nefit. es of t the the of a from On same y the es of fore, AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-65615- 5. This both the parties. 6. The p in conspiracy with public persons and been found in pos Though the allega offences for whic accused, however, 05 days. The trial examined so far. petitioner in custo is the rule and jail not be replica of p made above, this C petitioner on bail the petitioner is or personal as well Magistrate, concer 7. It is construed as an ex shall not influence -2025 (O&M) 4 This Court has heard the rival subm The petitioner is alleged to be a mem y with them is alleged to have been r ns and giving the same to the co-accus in possession of 04 countrymade pis allegations prima facie make out a c which he has been booked by hatch wever, he is in custody for over a per e trial will take time to conclude as no o far. No fruitful purpose would custody anymore. It is well settled p nd jail is an exception. Even otherwise ca of post-conviction sentencing. Kee , this Court is of the considered opinio n bail has been made out. According r is ordered to be released on regular well as surety bonds to the satisfa concerned. It is clarified that the observation an expression of opinion of this Cour luence the outcome of the trial in any m l submissions made by counsel for a member of notorious gangsters and been receiving money extorted from accused. He is also alleged to have de pistols and 04 empty magazines. ut a case for commission of subject hatching a conspiracy with the co- a period of 01 year, 04 months and as no prosecution witness has been would be served by detaining the ttled proposition of law that the bail erwise pre-trial incarceration should . Keeping in view the discussion as opinion that a case for release of the ordingly, the petition is allowed and egular bail, subject to his furnishing satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty vations made above shall not be s Court on the merits of the case and n any manner.
l for s and from have ines. bject - and been the bail ould n as f the and hing Duty t be and AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-65615- 8. Since any, is rendered in 29.01.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 5 Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous.
(MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
  
een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.30 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.