Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

1958 DAILYLAW 4 (DEL)

MIRZA SHAHROZ BEG & ANR. v. THE STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(CRL)/1958/2026 · 2026-07-09

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Writ Petition (Criminal)body1958

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~102 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1958/2026 MIRZA SHAHROZ BEG & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ansh Garg, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari(ASC), Mr. Alok Sharma, Mr. Pavitra Dixit, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 09.07.2026 CRL.M.A. 19586/2026 (EXEMPTION) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 1958/2026 3. The petitioners by way of the instant petition seek directions against respondent no. 1 to provide protection and security from respondent nos. 3 to 5. 4. The facts would indicate that the parties in the midst of civil dispute owning to a property. The said dispute is pending before the Court of competent jurisdiction. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have received This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:14:02 threats from respondent nos. 3 to 5. 6. Firstly, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file appropriate application before the Court of competent jurisdiction seeking injunction against the respondent nos. 3 to 5. In any case, if the petitioners feel that the respondent nos. 3 to 5 are responsible for commission of any cognizable offence, they can also file appropriate complaint before the competent Court of Magistrate. 7. Reserving the aforesaid liberties in favour of the petitioners, the Court is not inclined to allow the instant petition and to direct for providing security. Accordingly, no case is made out to extend the security cover to the petitioners, therefore, the petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 9, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:14:02