IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 102 Rasandeep Singh @ Seepa State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL 1. FIR No.100 Tragic (Prevension) Act, 1956, Police Station Talwandi Sabo, Bathinda. This 2. had been falsely young men disclosed that Petitioner was available on its owner. The Petitioner had investigation. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Singh @ Seepa V/S Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Balraj Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.(ORAL) Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail dated 30.04.2026, under Section Tragic (Prevension) Act, 1956, Police Station Talwandi Sabo, his is the first petition for anticipatory Learned counsel for the petitioner falsely implicated in the case. As and women who were apprehended that the petitioner was running the was not present at the spot and record to show that he had taken The disclosure statement of co-accus had clean antecedents and was ready investigation. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CRM-M-31470-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Advocate Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case arising out of , under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Immoral Tragic (Prevension) Act, 1956, Police Station Talwandi Sabo, District anticipatory bail. petitioner submits that petitioner As per case set up, some apprehended from a house the business of prostitution. and there was no rent deed taken the house on rent from accused was not admissible. ready and willing to join KAPIL 2026.05.29 20:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31470-2026 (O&M) -2- 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, arguing that on 26.04.2026, the police party, while on patrol duty chanced upon a house where several boys and girls were present and were found in objectionable position. Name of the petitioner was disclosed as the person who, in connivance with co-accused, Harjinder Singh was running the illegal business of prostitution, forcing the girls in the illegal trade. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner was required and it was not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. 5. Given the nature and substance of allegations against the petitioner who is alleged to be running flesh trade in a premises, his custodial interrogation would be necessitated to elicit useful facts and to recover rent deed of the premises. Grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage, would seriously impede the process of investigation, which is not permissible. Hence the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is declined. 6. Dismissed. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 29.05.2026 JUDGE Kapil Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KAPIL 2026.05.29 20:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document