CRM-M-1956 IN THE (211-1 ) HARPREET STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Bharatiya Na petitioner seek registered und the Bharatiya Jodhan, Distric 2. petitioner wa investigation. 3. and on instruc 19568-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM Da EET SINGH Versus
PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Gurbir Singh Dhillon, Advoc Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Pu ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition u a Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 r seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR d under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 296 ratiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for shor District Ludhiana. Vide order dated 09.04.2026 p r was released on interim bail a ation. Learned State counsel filed stat instructions states that the petitioner ha JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-19568-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 05.05.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent E MANISHA BATRA Advocate for the petitioner G, Punjab tion under Section 482 of the 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), the e FIR No.0032 dated 08.03.2026 ), 296, 351(3), 191(3) and 190 of r short “BNS”) at Police Station 026 passed by this Court, the bail and was directed to join d status report dated 27.04.2026 has joined the investigation AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-1956 on 10.04.2026 of weapon use hence, his cust 4. the aspect of itself be a grou High Court in (3) CCR 2764 2022(1) RCR levelled again incarceration i be a replica of above discusse 09.04.2026 gra to compliance 5. application, if 05.05.2026 Amit Sharma 19568-2026 (O&M) (2) 4.2026. Learned State counsel has su on used in the offence could not be e is custodial interrogation is required. The petitioner joined investigatio ct of non-recovery is concerned, me a ground for denial of bail as has also urt in case titled as ‘Jagdish Thakka 2764’ and in case titled as ‘Pooran RCR (Criminal) 503. Given the against him, this Court is of the ation is not required. Even other pre lica of post-conviction sentencing. Ta iscussed fact, the present petition is a 26 granting interim bail to the petition liance of conditions laid down in Secti Since the main petition has b if any, is rendered infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   has submitted that since recovery ot be effected from the petitioner, ired. tigation on 10.04.2026. So far as ed, mere non-recovery cannot by s also been observed by the Delhi akkar vs. State of Delhi’, 1992 oran Singh vs. State of Delhi’, en the nature of the allegations f the opinion that his pre-trial r pre-trial incarceration should not ng. Taking into consideration the on is allowed and the order dated etitioner is made absolute, subject n Section 482(2) of BNSS. has been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.