Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
204
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SHASHI RANI
BHAGAT SINGH
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Mr. Amandeep Sheroan,
Ms. Anu Garg,
(through video conferencing).
HARKESH MANUJA
1. The applicant petition titled “Shashi Rani Vs. Bhagat Singh” 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
“the Act”) at the instance of respondent Principal Judge, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri to learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Panchkula.
2. Briefly stating, the marriage between the applicant and respondent was solemnized on 24.06.2021; out of their wedlock, a Akshaj was born; on account of matrimonial discord between the parties, the above mentioned petition under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Act, came to be preferred at the instance of respondent present application applicant-wife.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant, applicant-wife is residing alongwith her son at her parental home at Panchkula. Accordingly, a prayer is made for transfer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:
Versus BHAGAT SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Amandeep Sheroan, Advocate for the Ms. Anu Garg, Advocate for the (through video conferencing). **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
The applicant-wife, by way of present application, seeks transfer of
“Shashi Rani Vs. Bhagat Singh” 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as at the instance of respondent-husband; from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri to learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Panchkula. Briefly stating, the marriage between the applicant and respondent was solemnized on 24.06.2021; out of their wedlock, a Akshaj was born; on account of matrimonial discord between the parties, the above mentioned petition under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Act, came to be preferred at the instance of respondent present application seeking transfer thereof came to be filed by the
Learned counsel for the applicant, inter alia wife is residing alongwith her son at her parental home at Panchkula. Accordingly, a prayer is made for transfer
TA-505-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA-505-2026 Date of Decision: July 15, 2026
........Applicant
........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the applicant. Advocate for the respondent. wife, by way of present application, seeks transfer of
“Shashi Rani Vs. Bhagat Singh”, filed under Section (hereinafter to be referred as usband; from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri to learned Principal Judge, Briefly stating, the marriage between the applicant and respondent was solemnized on 24.06.2021; out of their wedlock, a male child namely, Akshaj was born; on account of matrimonial discord between the parties, the above mentioned petition under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Act, came to be preferred at the instance of respondent-husband. Thereupon, the seeking transfer thereof came to be filed by the inter alia, contends that the wife is residing alongwith her son at her parental home at Panchkula. Accordingly, a prayer is made for transfer of the above
2026 July 15, 2026
wife, by way of present application, seeks transfer of , filed under Section (hereinafter to be referred as usband; from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri to learned Principal Judge, Briefly stating, the marriage between the applicant and respondent male child namely, Akshaj was born; on account of matrimonial discord between the parties, the above mentioned petition under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Act, came to husband. Thereupon, the seeking transfer thereof came to be filed by the , contends that the wife is residing alongwith her son at her parental home at of the above TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.07.20 11:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
2
TA-505-2026
mentioned petition filed at the instance of respondent-husband from Family Court, Charkhi Dadri to Family Court, Panchkula. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposes the prayer made on behalf of the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book. 6. In the present case, the petitioner along with her minor son has to travel a distance of around 260 kilometers from Charkhi Dadri to Panchkula which causes a great deal of inconvenience to her.
Moreover, the minor son namely, Akshaj is suffering from chronic bronchitis and is undergoing treatment at Panchkula. 7. Further, reliance can be placed upon the judgments in “Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay”, 2002 SC 396 and “Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor Babulal Pardeshi, 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed that “while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue hardships.”
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the humble opinion of this Court, since the distance between Charkhi Dadri and Panchkula is approximately 260 kilometres and the minor son namely Akshaj is undergoing treatment for chronic bronchitis at Panchkula, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice that petitioner under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) titled “Shashi Rani Vs. Bhagat Singh” filed by the respondent-husband, be transferred from the Court of learned Principal TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.07.20 11:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
3
TA-505-2026
Judge, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Panchkula. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the learned Family Court, Charkhi Dadri to the Court concerned. Accordingly, the present transfer application is allowed. 9. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
15.07.2026
(HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.07.20 11:13 I agree to specified portions of this document