RSA-1955- IN THE HIG 259 Gurmeet Sin Pritam Singh CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP concurrent j whereby the 29.05.1967 plaintiff in l for cancella consequentia from alienati -2024 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o eet Singh Versus Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff-appellant is in rrent judgments and decrees rendered by the suit for declaration to the eff 1967 is illegal, invalid, inoperative no ff in land in dispute; and for possessi ncellation of mutation of his share uential relief of permanent injunctio lienating the land in dispute, was dism Office report dated 05.10.2024 <The above noted case Phoolka (Advocate) against 12.10.2016 passed by ADJ Jala be listed before the Ho9ble Benc It is pertinent to mention No. 1996 of 2017 was filed b against the judgment and decre ADJ Jalandhar and the same Hon9ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gup pleased to dismiss the same on It is also submitted 01.04.2019 of Hon9ble the Ch ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1955-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.02.2026 .& Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA is in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts the effect that the sale deed dated ive not binding upon the right of the ssession of the land in dispute; and share in the land in dispute with junction restraining the defendants s dismissed. .2024 reads as under:- ase has been filed by Sh. P.K.S. nst judgment and decree dated Jalandhar and the same is yet to Bench. tion here that earlier similar RSA led by Sh. Advocate Rajiv Joshi, ecree dated 12.10.2016 passed by ame was lastly listed before the Gupta whereby his Lordship was on merits. ed that as per Orders dated Chief Justice conveyed through the urts ated f the and with ants .S. ed to SA hi, by he as ed gh RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.19 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1955- decrees of b filed RSA- this Court vi appeal is not
17.02.2026 rishu -2024 (O&M) -2- learned Registrar Judicial sepa the DRR Section and is regist then the same shall not be retur by way of Judicial Order. Accordingly, the abov similarity/duplicity of case ma notice of the Hon9ble Bench at t Since, against the impugned s of both the District Courts, the appe -1996-2017 which was dismissed ourt vide order dated 12.10.2016, con l is not maintainable. Dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable separately, when a fresh is filed in egistered at a particular number, returned nor de-registered, except above stated facts regarding e may kindly be brought to the h at the time of hearing.= ugned concurrent judgments and e appellant-plaintiff had previously issed by the Predecessor Bench of 6, consequently, the present second any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No in er, pt ng he and usly h of ond RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.19 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.