CRWP-3877 IN THE HIGH (209) ROHIT STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHE CORAM: Present: MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.5 has been filed, which is taken on record. 2. Ms. Devpriya, detenue, is present in is not willing to accompany the petitioner and she has been voluntarily residing with her parents. Section 12 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has already been seeking annulment of the marriage. 3. In pursuance thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn. 18.04.2026 Amit Sharma 3877-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Ms. Apurva Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana Respondent No.5 in person with Mr. Ajay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.5 **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.5 has been filed, which is taken on record. Status report by learned State counsel has been filed. Ms. Devpriya, detenue, is present in the is not willing to accompany the petitioner and she has been voluntarily residing with her parents. It is also submitted by her that the petition under ection 12 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has already been seeking annulment of the marriage. In pursuance thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3877-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Advocate for the petitioner Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana Respondent No.5 in person with Mr. Ajay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.5 Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.5 has been filed, which d State counsel has been filed. the Court and has stated that she is not willing to accompany the petitioner and she has been voluntarily is also submitted by her that the petition under ection 12 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has already been filed by her In pursuance thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No Date of decision : 18.04.2026 .. Petitioner s Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.5 has been filed, which Court and has stated that she is not willing to accompany the petitioner and she has been voluntarily is also submitted by her that the petition under by her In pursuance thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.18 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.