Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

1955 DAILYLAW 1 (AP)

Pamidi Sreenivasulu Yadav v. Sri Mukesh Kumar Meena IAS

CC/1955/2026 · 2026-06-14

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body1955

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010267652026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1955/2026 Between: 1. PAMIDI SREENIVASULU YADAV, S/O.P NARAYANA YADAV, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, LICENSEE OF M/S.VIJAYA DURGA WINES (L.NO.114/2024-26). R/O.P.VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, YERRAGUNTIA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516309. 2. A.V.NAGENDRA PRASAD REDDY, S/O.A NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. LICENSEE OF M/S.NAGENDRA WINES(L.NO.113/2024-26), R/O.D.NO.1-152, CHINNASINGANAPALLI, DUVVUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT- 516175. 3. RACHAKONDU SUBBARAYUDU, S/O.R.BALA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. LICENSEE OF M/S.ROYAL WINES (L.NO. 110/2024-26), R/O.KALVAKUNTIA VILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516193. 4. GAJJA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O.PEDDA VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. LICENSEE OF M/S.BALAJI WINES (L.NO. KDP/GK04/2024-26), R/O.D.NO. 4/211-A, CHINTHA KUNTA, C BAYANAPALII, DUVVUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT - 516175. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 2 522238. 2. SRI CHAMAKURI SRIDHAR IAS, DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503. 3. SRI M JAYARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, KADAPA-516001. 4. SRI K NAGA MALLESWAR REDDY, DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER, KADAPA-516001. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act willfully disobeying the orders of this Honble Court in W.P.No. 7240 of 2026, Dt. 13.03.2026, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1955 of 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. The said fact was not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.06.2026 SJ 4 81 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.1955 of 2026 15.06.2026 SSJJ