$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1954/2026 AKSHITA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Ahlawat, Adv. with petitioner in person versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC for State ASI Pradeep Kr. and SI Satpal Dagar, PS.: Sec-23, Dwarka Mr. Aakash Sehrawat, Mr. Jatin Chhillar and Mr. Nikhil Godara, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 present in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 10.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties has handed over a fresh Settlement dated 09.07.2026, which is taken on record. 2. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No.122/2026 dated 11.05.2026 registered at PS.: Sector 23, Dwarka under Sections 115(2)/126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Settlement dated 09.07.2026, whereby the petitioner and the respondent no.2 have mutually This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2026 at 11:42:41 resolved their disputes. 3. Issue notice. 4. Learned SC accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 also accepts notice and submits that the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed. 6. This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioner as well as the respondent no.2, who all are present in Court. They affirm the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Deed dated 09.07.2026. As such, the parties have agreed to put a quietus to their disputes. Respondent no.2 hence submits that she does not wish to continue the aforesaid FIR against the petitioner. 7. The petitioner and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials as on record, have been identified by the Investigating Officer. 8. As noted above, a settlement based on mutual terms between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, as also following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2026 at 11:42:41 in futility. 9. Therefore, the present petition is allowed and No.122/2026 dated 11.05.2026 registered at PS.: Sector 23, Dwarka under Sections 115(2)/126(2) of the BNS as also all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 10. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J JULY 10, 2026/rr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2026 at 11:42:41