Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

1952 DAILYLAW 2 (AP)

DANDU BALA MUNEIAH v. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA, IAS

CC/1952/2026 · 2026-06-14

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body1952

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010267692026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1952/2026 Between: 1. DANDU BALA MUNEIAH, S/O.NADIPI MUNEIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, LICENSEE OF M/S. VAIBHAV WINES, R/O.D.NO.23-51, GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, MYDUKUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 516172. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522238. 2. SRI CHAMAKURI SRIDHAR IAS, DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503. 3. SRI M JAYARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, KADAPA-516001. 4. K NAGA MALLESWAR REDDY, DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER, KADAPA-516001. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under Section 10 to 12 of 2 the Contempt of Courts Act willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 6667 of 2026, Dt.10.03.2026, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1952 of 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. The said fact was not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.06.2026 SJ 4 80 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.1952 of 2026 15.06.2026 SSJJ