SEEMA KHARYAL v. STATE TH.LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT AND ORS.
SWP/1951/2016 · 2026-08-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body1951
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1951 DAILYLAW 3 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1951 DAILYLAW 3 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1951/2016
Seema Kharyal ….Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
State of J&K & Ors ….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy AG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.08.2026
01. Record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 04.05.2026 and same is the position today as well. Thus inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition.
02. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 07.08.2026 Vijay
Sr. No. 205 Vijay Kumar 2026.08.10 18.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu