APHC010267792026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1951/2026 Between: 1. SINGAMREDDY NAGESWAR REDDY, S/O.S JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, LICENSEE OF M/S.CHOWDESWARI WINES(L.NO.61/2024-26), R/O.D.NO.2/210, DEVAGUDI VILLAGE, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT - 516434. 2. KUPPANNAGARI VEERA MOHAN REDDY, S/O.K.V.RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. LICENSEE OF M/S.VEERABHADRA WINES (L.NO.62/2024-26) R/O.D.NO.2/99/4, DEVAGUDI, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT - 516434. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522238. 2. SRI CHAMAKURI SRIDHAR IAS, DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503. 3. SRI M JAYARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, KADAPA-516001. 4. SRI K NAGA MAIIESWAR REDDY, DISTRICT PROHIBITION EXCISE OFFICER, KADAPA-516001. 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to For the reasons stated in the accompany affidavit, this Honble Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act willfully disobeying the orders of this Honble Court in W.P.No. 7012 of 2026, Dt. 12.03.2026, and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1951 of 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. The said fact was not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.06.2026 SJ 4 79 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.1951 of 2026 15.06.2026 SSJJ