Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

1950 DAILYLAW 2 (JK)

DHYAN CHAND AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/1950/2026 · 2026-07-03

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

body1950

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 1950/2026 Dhyan Chand and others …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. R. S. Katoch, Advocate Vs U.T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-1, 2 & 3 Ms. Meharbali, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R 4, 5 & 6 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 03.07.2026 1. After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that he would feel satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondent No. 3 to decide the representation alleged to have been preferred by the petitioners is considered within some reasonable period, to which Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting Counsel appearing vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, leanred Senior AAG on behalf of Nos. 1, 2 & 3 and Ms. Meharbali, Assisting Counsel appearing vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta learned AAG on behalf of respondent Nos. 4, 5 & 6, have no objection provided the same is directed to be considered strictly under rules and as per law. 2. Since an innocuous prayer has been made by learned counsel for the petitioners and keeping in view no objection by learned counsel for the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of at the threshold by directing Sr. No. 167 2 WP (C) No. 1950/2026 respondent No. 3 to accord due consideration to the representation alleged to have been made by the petitioners strictly under rules and as per law, within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order along with the copy of writ petition and its annexure are made available to the said respondent. The copy of the representation is stated to have been placed on record as Annexure II. The order of consideration, which is likely to be passed be forwarded to the petitioner through registered post. 3. The instant writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of along with connected application(s) in the manner indicated above. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 03.07.2026 Nikhil